meeting notes＿2015＿10_25
- evalution: does the occupy action successful or fail?
Irene:
- at the beginning, the passive energy is not good
- it come better afterward, with more act. happen
- not enough action to tell the public what u fighting for?
Roland:
originally purpose of occupy is to
question ADC, how they should settle wht wooferten hv build in this 4 yrs
i.e ask for a space for settle down
i.e change policy
i.e. occupy is not sucessful
Irene: agree
Fung:
originally purpose of occupy is not clear
just becoz it is not right to just go out without such condition
- cant just walk away, so many things did not get settle
- to keep strong toward ADC/instituion, as what Wooferten have been doing
- Buy time, to cathch more time for the transition
e.g
- master wong,
- build a new team
- soboring (woofer monday?)
- Mic, Irene n Kevin
- some kaifong
I.e it is more like a Learning process (which cant say sucessful or fail)
Wht gain?
- a deeper understanding of Wooferten
- how to mainstain the space without funding, n ppl partcipation
- How to build a team n idea of common
- Final Statement
- wht we have did within this 2 yrs
- wht we gain, and wht we miss?
- Observation and stories
Roland: wht is the difference bw having ADC funding n Autonomous space?
Michael: Not sucess or fail, but the process and stories
---
(Final) Stories Exhibition:
(Final) Stories Exhibition:
- Observation and stories of each of us
- 2 yrs activties
- Kaifong words
---
Kaifong exhibition @window side
Irene: Ben drawing
Michael:
5-6 Henry’s comics selected by him
related to Wooferten or sth he developed here
those he think representable
comics + stories interview by Kevin
